# 3(40)2020
Issued 1.10.

# 2(39)2020
Issued 1.07.

# 1(38)2020
Issued 1.04.

# 4(37)2019
Issued 01.01.

# 3(36)2019
Issued 1.10.

# 2(35)2019
Issued 1.07.

# 1(34)2019
Issued 1.04.

# 4(33)2018
Issued 1.01.

# 3(32)2018
Issued 1.10.

# 2(31)2018
Issued 1.07.

# 1(30)2018
Issued 1.04.

# 4(29)2017
Issued 1.01.

# 3(28)2017
Issued 1.10.

# 2(27)2017
Issued 1.07.

# 1(26)2017
Issued 1.04.

Google Scholar


# 3 (40) 2020: Stage Speech vs. Public Speech. The Oral Aspect of Actual Performative Culture

Topic of the Issue


The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
Laboratory for Historical and Cultural Studies, School of Advanced Studies in the Humanities
Senior Researcher
PhD in Cultural Studies

Oral Speech about the extraordinary as a medium in live arts

The article discusses the possibility of analyzing oral speech as a media in the performative arts of the last quarter of the twentieth century. The art of the 1990s-2010s is described in theory through the concepts of the cross-border nature of artistic gesture (Rosalind Krauss, Claire Bishop). But the conventions of Modern theater still influence the behavior of participants in situations organized by the artist inside a Museum or gallery or in other public spaces. Semiotic theory of oral speech (B. Gasparov) opens the possibility of understanding nonverbal types of signs that create the materiality of performance (E. Fischer-Lichte). In the case study of actual performative culture (Olga Shilyaeva's "28 days", 2018; the play "What did the birds say to Franciscus Assisiensis? "production" Transformer.doc" and the Sokolniki Park Ornitharium Moskau, 2019; Tino Segal's situation "A Progress" 2010, "This Objective of that Object" 2004; Nikita Alekseev's action "10,000 Steps" 1980) revealed the destructive function of oral speech. The article offers a theoretical concept of "the art of revelation" in relation to these cases.

Key words: aesthetics of the performative, oral speech, extraordinary, art of participation, actionism, site-specific theater, new drama, art of revelation, B. Gasparov, E. Fisher-Lichte, T. Segal, N. Alexeev.


  • Bulgakova O. Golos kak kulturny fenomen (The Voise as a Cultural Phenomen). Moskau.:NLO. 2015.(in Russian)
  • Krauss, Rosalind E. A voyage on the North Sea : art in the age of the post-medium condition / Rosalind Krauss. New York, N.Y. : Thames & Hudson, 2000.
  • Aronson, O. (2016) Pravo na iskusstvo (The Right to Art) // Siniy divan (Blue Sofa). 2016. Vol.21. S.29–49.(in Russian)
  • Gasparov B. Ustnaya rech kak semiotichesky ob‘ekt (Oral Speech as semiotic Object) // Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta (Scientific Notes of the University of Tartu). 1978. Vol. 442. S. 63-112. (in Russian)
  • Greenberg C. Art and Culture: Critical Esseys / Boston. Beacon Press. 1984. 278 c.
  • Bishop, Claire. Artificial hells : participatory art and the politics of spectatorship / Claire Bishop.London ; New York : Verso Books, 2012.
  • Bourriaud, N. Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Presses du réel, 2002.


Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow, Russia
Head of the Department of Aesthetics, PhD in Philosophy

Speech and Revolution (An Outline for a Theory of Action)

One of the main contentions of the present study is as follows: Speech, the echoes of which are perceived as individual statements in the course of collective demonstrations, is the direct effect of mass action. The masses appeared on the historical arena as an independent force already in the 19th century. It is appropriate to recollect two images of the masses that took shape in the early stages of Modernity, namely, that of the mob in Thomas Hobbes and that of a dynamic of material forces in Benedict Spinoza. Although the term they use is the same (multitude, multitudo), its reading by the two philosophers is radically different. It is a materialist and physicalistic understanding of the masses as the combined action of multiple forces that holds true for contemporary social movements. And this is the exact reason why Spinoza’s radical philosophy aimed at the discovery of the real causes of phenomena becomes so relevant and topical today. One can say that this philosophy prioritizes the interactions of bodies or, to put it another way, highlights relations. It is from this perspective that one should be treating transformations that we witness on a global scale.
Slogans are an example of speech that participates in transformations themselves. They can be viewed as so-called performatives that change the existing state of things. However, recent phenomena tend to alter our idea of slogans: they have become closer to constative utterances rather than performatives. Such are many of the French slogans of May ’68, but especially those that were displayed at the 2011 protest actions in Moscow. Analyzing the events of May ’68, the acclaimed social scientist Michel de Certeau emphasizes the right to speech as the fundamental right of individuals asserted thanks to the sudden outbreak of enunciation. He compares the taking of speech (la prise de parole) with the taking of the Bastille. My claim, however, is that, unlike individualized speech, we are dealing with the drone of voices, which is nothing other than the expression of mass collective action. And such is the precise meaning of the “displacement” of language (a term used by de Certeau himself). Thus speech that participates in transformations makes them strikingly apparent.
This indirectly points to the crisis of representation (in the philosophical sense) but also to the crisis of representative democracy. One of the main slogans of Bolotnaya Square – “You don’t even represent us” (also meaning: “You cannot imagine what we are capable of”) – unambiguously testifies to this. In the social sphere, representation is replaced with direct democracy or grassroots social initiatives, while in the sphere of art, theater included, new documentality is gaining ground. Avoiding any kind of spectacularity, the latter engages with appropriated speech (speech as a “found object”). In each of these cases we are dealing with the appearance of the “multitude” as the manifestation of the dynamic of contemporary social being. A dynamic of this kind calls for new analytical tools, for example, an alternative semiotics. Here one may draw inspiration from Charles Sanders Peirce, especially his tripartite structure of signs as well the idea of abduction as a way of uncovering already existing but implicit connections. The crucial thing, however, is that masses engaged in collective action lead to a new understanding of revolution, which has nothing to do with the old Marxian doctrine. Revolutions today are no longer bloodbaths; they are non-violent mass actions resulting in deep transformations. This appears to be not only the achievement but also the direct heritage of May ’68.

Key words: speech, revolution, masses (multitude), action, slogan, relation, anthropology, B. Spinoza, Th. Hobbes, M. de Certeau, Ch.S. Peirce.


  • Althusser, L. Lénine et la philosophie, trans. by N. Kulish, ed. by V. Sofronov. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2005. 176 p. (In Russian)
  • Austin, J.L. “How to Do Things with Words”, in: J.L. Austin, Izbrannoe [Selected Writings], trans. by L.B. Makeeva, V.P. Rudnev. Moscow: Ideia-Press, Dom Intellektual’noi Knigi Publ., 1999, pp. 13–135. (In Russian)
  • Bakhtin, M.M. K filosofii postupka [Toward a Philosophy of the Act]  (In Russain)
  • Bikbov, A. “Predstavitel’stvo i samoupolnomochenie. Po materialam issledovaniia NII mitingov” [Representation and Self-Governance. Based on the Findings of the Independent Research Initiative, December 2011 – June 2012], Logos, 2012, Vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 189–229. (In Russian)
  • Bourg, J. From Revolution to Ethics. May 1968 and Contemporary French Thought. Montreal & Kingston, London, Chicago: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017. 468 p.
  • Certeau, M. de. La prise de parole et autres écrits politiques, édition établie et présentée par L. Giard. Paris: Seuil, 1994. 278 p.
  • Evreinov, N. “Teatr i eshafot. K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii teatra kak publichnogo instituta” [Theater and the Scaffold. On the Origins of Theater as a Public Institution] (In Russian)
  • Foucault, M. Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison, trans. by V. Naumov, ed. by I. Borisova. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 1999. 480 p. (In Russian)
  • Hobbes, Th. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive), ed. by B. Gert. Indianapolis, Ind., Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Co., 1991. 388 p.
  • Jameson, F. “Utopia as Replication”, in: F. Jameson, Valences of the Dialectic. London, New York: Verso, 2009, pp. 410–434.
  • Negri, A. The Savage Anomaly. The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics, trans. by M. Hardt. Minneapolis, Minn., Oxford: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. 280 p.
  • Negri, A. Spinoza for Our Time: Politics and Postmodernity, trans. by W. McCuaig. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013. 128 p.
  • Negri, A. Subversive Spinoza: (Un)contemporary Variations, ed. by T.S. Murphy, trans. by T.S. Murphy, M. Hardt, T. Stolze and Ch.T. Wolfe. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press, 2004. 124 p.
  • Peirce, Ch.S. “Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism (1903)”, in: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 2 (1893–1913), ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington, Indianapolis, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1998, pp. 133–241.
  • Petrovsky, H. Vozmushchenie znaka. Kul’tura protiv transtsendentsii [Disturbance of the Sign: Culture Against Transcendence]. Moscow: Common place, 2019. 288 p. + pl.: 32 p. (In Russian)
  • Podoroga, V.A. Vtoroi ekran. Sergei Eizenshtein i kinematograf nasiliia. T. 1. Zerkal’naia podporka. Materialy k psikhobiografii [The Second Screen. Sergei Eisenstein and the Cinema of Violence. Vol. 1. The Mirror Support. Materials for a Psychobiography]. Moscow: BREUS Publ., 2017, 352 p., ill. (In Russian)
  • Renanskii, D. “Kak segodniashniaia publika vosprinimaet ‘stil’ Stalin’” [How Today’s Audience Perceives “Stalin-Style”], Vedomosti, 20.09.2018 (In Russian)
  • Searle, J.R. “What Is a Speech Act?”, trans. by I.M. Kobozeva, in: Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. XVII: Teoriia rechevykh aktov [New Perspectives in Foreign Linguistics. Vol. XVII: The Theory of Speech Acts], comp. by I.M. Kobozeva and V.Z. Dem’iankov, ed. by B.Iu. Gorodetskii. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1986, pp. 151–169. (In Russian)
  • Spinoza, B. “Ethica”, trans. by N.A. Ivantsov, in: B. Spinoza, Izbrannye proizvedeniia v 2 t. [Selected Works in 2 Vols.], ed. by V.V. Sokolov. Vol. I. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., 1957, pp. 359–618. (In Russian)
  • Spinoza, B. “Tractatus politicus”, trans. by S.M. Rogovin and B.V. Chredin, in: B. Spinoza, Izbrannye proizvedeniia v 2 t. [Selected Works in 2 Vols.], ed. by V.V. Sokolov. Vol. II. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., 1957, pp. 285–382. (In Russian)
  • Virno, P. Grammatica della moltitudine. Per una analisi delle forme di vita contemporanee, trans. by A.G. Petrova, ed. by A.A. Penzin. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2013. 176 p. (In Russian).


Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences , Moscow, Russia
Department of Aesthetics, Senior Research Fellow, PhD in Philosophy

From the Logic of Sensus Communis to the Aesthetics of Equality

The article draws on the interpretation of sensus communis in Kant's Critique of Judgment. Kant argues with the understanding of this concept as “common sense” in the English tradition. His sensus communis is part of the antinomy of taste, where it does not indicate the individual aspect of taste, but implies instead universal consensus. In his later work, “The Conflict of the Faculties”, while describing revolutionary enthusiasm, Kant brings up this topic again, but already in conjunction with the political context of the French Revolution. Taking into consideration the attempt to combine Kantian aesthetics and the theory of political judgment (H. Arendt), as well as the interpretation of “enthusiasm” in terms of the analytic of the sublime (J.-F. Lyotard), the author proposes to trace the logic of the development of sensus communis in light of the discursive changes provoked by the revolutionary action of the masses. Revolution is treated not as a historical rupture but as a process of long duration (in the sense of Fernand Braudel’s longue durée). Signs of a revolution thus understood are to be found beyond the regime of human perception and contemplation, beyond the categories of space and time, in the zone of sensus communis, indicating the possibility of surpassing the self-identical subject and anthropomorphic perception (the human experience of history, science, and society). The logic of sensus communis as collective action based on equality and solidarity correlates with Darwin’s idea of pre-adaptation, which is further developed into the concept of exaptation in contemporary evolutionary biology. The exaptation model manifests itself both in formal mathematics (the multiplicity of axiomatic systems) and in the action of society, for which “freedom”, “equality”, and “solidarity” are no longer ideals and values, but forms of sensus communis. The “aesthetics of equality” is described precisely through these forms. This allows one to leave behind both traditional aesthetic categories reflecting the sensual experience of the cognizing individual as well as rational (i.e., economic, legal, ethical) ways of interpreting equality.

Key words: sensus communis, common sense, Kant, enthusiasm, aesthetics, equality, solidarity, mass, time of long duration, revolution.


  • Arendt H. Lekcii po politicheskoj filosofii Kanta. SPb.: Nauka, 2011. 303 s. (In Russian).
  • Bad'yu A. Apostol Pavel. Obosnovanie universalizma. Per. O. Golovoj. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1999. 96 s. (In Russian)
  • Badiou A. Being and Event, translated by O. Felthman, N.Y.: Continuum, 2005. 526 p.
  • Braudel F. History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée // The Longue Durée and World-Systems Analysis. Edited and with an Introduction by Richard E. Lee with a new translation of Fernand Braudel’s “Histoire et Sciences sociales: La longue durée” by Immanuel Wallerstein. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2012. P. 241–276.
  • Gil'bert D. Osnovaniya geometrii. Petrograd: Seyatel', 1923. 152 s.
  • Gould S.J., Vrba E. Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form // Paleobiology, Vol.8, No.1 (Winter 1982). P. 4–15.
  • Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant I. Sobr. soch. V 8 t. Obshchaya redakciya A. G ulygi. T.5. M.: CHoro, 1994. 414 c. (In Russian)
  • Kant I. Spor fakul'tetov // Kant I. Sobr. soch. V 8 t. Obshchaya redakciya A. Gulygi. T. 7. M.: CHoro, 1994. C.157–136. (In Russian)
  • Lyotard, J.-F. Enthusiasm: The Kantian Critique of History. Translated by G. van den Abbeele. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009. 74 p.
  • Rans'er ZH. Razdelyaya chuvstvennoe. Per. s fr. V. Lapickogo, A. SHestakova. SPb: Izd-vo Evropejskogo Universiteta, 2007. 264 s. (In Russian)
  • Salikov A.N. Sposobnost' suzhdeniya kak politicheskaya problema v filosofii Hanny Arendt // Vestnik RGU im. Kanta. 2008. Vyp. 6. Gumanitarnye nauki. S.34–40. (In Russian)
  • Spinoza B. Politicheskij traktat // Spinoza B. Izbr. proizvedeniya. V 2 t. T. 2. M., 1957. S.185–382. (In Russian).


The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
Laboratory for Historical and Cultural Studies, School of Advanced Studies in the Humanities
Senior Researcher, PhD in Art History

Poetry Performances of the second half of the 1920s from the Perspective of S.I. Bernstein’s Dynamic Theory

In the early 1920s, the Russian Formalists made a landmark contribution to the Russian speech aesthetics by considering the artistic spoken word from the perspective of literary theory. In 1923, Sergei Ignat’evich Bernshtein (1892–1970), a linguist and an active member of the Society for the Study of Poetic Language (OPOIAZ), founded KIKhR (The Office for the Study of Literary Speech). KIKhR became the leading center for the studies of spoken literary language. Seeking to define the relationships between the text and its performance, Bernshtein and KIKhR colleagues developed a multifaceted interdisciplinary methodology, venturing far beyond textual analysis. In the late 1920s, they also became interested in the analysis of the dynamics of a declamatory composition. Their approaches were developed through the analysis of the actor's declamation. However, in early 1930, the Laboratory had a number of meetings where they discussed the recitation and texts of young poets, members of the Literary Center of Constructivists. Their performance style was strikingly different from previous schools and groups. The paper gives an account of the relationships established in this late period between Laboratory and a literary group of poets-constructivists. In 1930, when new composition theory of Bernstein and his colleagues were completed, it turned out that similar processes were developing in the literature and performative culture in general at the same time.

Key words: Russian formalism, Laboratory for the Study of Literary Speech, Performance Studies, Poetry Performance, Constructivism, avant-garde, Institute for Living Word, S.I. Bernshtein, Sound Poetry Scores, dynamics, 1920s.


  • Asaf'ev B. Muzykal'naia forma kak protsess (Musical Form as a Process). Leningrad, Muzyka Publ., 1971 (in Russian).
  • Aseev N. Razgrimirovannaia krasavitsa. Putevye zametki (The Beautiful Girl Without Her Makeup. Travel Notes). Moscow, Federatsiia Publ., 1929 (in Russian).
  • Bernshtein S.I. Esteticheskie predposylki teorii deklamatsii (Esthetics Premises of the Theory of Declamation). Poetika. Vremennik Slovesnogo otdela Gosudarstvennogo instituta istorii iskusstv (Poetics. Yearbook of the Literary Studies Department of the State Institute for Art History), no. 3. Leningrad: Academia Publ., 1927, pp. 25–44 (in Russian).
  • Bernshtein S.I. Golos Bloka (Blok’s Voice). Blokovskii sbornik II: Trudy Vtoroi nauchnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi izucheniiu zhizni i tvorchestva A.A. Bloka (Blok: In Memoriam. Vol.2: Papers of the second academic conference devoted to the life and art of A. A. Blok). Tartu, Tartuskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., 1972, pp. 454—525 (in Russian).
  • Bernshtein S.I. Stikh i deklamatsiia (Verse and Declamation). Russkaia rech' (Russian Speech), no. 1. Leningrad, Academia Publ., 1927, pp. 7—41 (in Russian).
  • Biriukov S. A.N. Chicherin: poet zvucharno-vizual'nyi, ili Chto goditsia dlia znaka poezii (Chicherin: sound-visual poet, or What is suitable for a sign of poetry )// Aleksei Chicherin: Konstruktivizm voskresheniia. Deklaratsii, konstruemy, poeziia, memuary. Issledovaniia i kommentarii (Alexei Chicherin: Constructivism of Resurrection. Declarations, “construemes”, poetry, memoirs. Researches and Commentaries). Saint-Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
  • Bogatyreva S.I. Serebrianyi vek v nashem dome (Silver Age in Our Home). Moscow, AST, Redaktsiia Eleny Shubinoi Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
  • Brang P. Das Klingende Wort. Zu Theorie und Praxis der Deklamationskunst in Russland. Wien, Verlag der ÖAW Publ., 1988 (in German).
  • Christiansen B. Philosophie der Kunst. Hanau: Clauss & Feddersen Publ., 1909 (in German).
  • Dukor I. Sergei Tret'iakov. Tret'iakov S. Rechevik. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1929, pp. 5–21 (in Russian). Eikhenbaum B.M. O poezii (On Poetry). Leningrad, Sovetskii pisatel' Publ., 1969 (in Russian).
  • Goncharenko A. Biografiia i konstruktivizm A.N. Chicherina (A. Chicherin’s Biography and his Approach to Constructivism). Aleksei Chicherin: Konstruktivizm voskresheniia. Deklaratsii, konstruemy, poeziia, memuary. Issledovaniia i kommentarii (Alexei Chicherin: Constructivism of Resurrection. Declarations, “Construemes”, Poetry, Memoirs. Researches and Commentaries). Saint-Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge Publ., 2019, pp. 187-209. (in Russian)
  • Grechko V. Skandinavskii sled: Broder Khristiansen, dominanta i formirovanie kontseptsii russkogo formalizma (Scandinavian Trace: Broder Christiansen, Dominant and the Formation of the Concept of Russian Formalism). Evropa v Rossii (Europe in Russia). Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2010, pp. 299–311 (in Russian).
  • Kovalenko S.A. Poety-konstruktivisty (Poets-constructivists). Russkaia literatura 1920-1930-kh godov. Portrety poetov (Russian Literature of 1920-30’s. Portraits of the Poets). Moscow, Institut mirovoj literatury Rossijskoj akademii nauk Publ., 2008, pp. 612–656 (in Russian).
  • Kurth E. Grundlagen des linearen Kontrapunkts. Bern: Max Drechsel Publ., 1917 (in German).
  • Maiakovskii V.V. Rasshirenie slovesnoi bazy (Expansion of the Verbal Base). Maiakovskii V.V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. (Complete Works) Vol.12. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literature Publ., 1959, pp. 159–163 (in Russian).
  • Naumova K. Zinaida Viktorovna Eval'd — sobiratel' i issledovatel' muzykal'nogo fol'klora (Zinaida Viktorovna Evald. Сollector and Researcher of Musical Folklore). Musicus. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoi gosudarstvennoi konservatorii im. N.A. Rimskogo-Korsakova (Musicus. Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg Rimsky-Korsakov State Conservatory). 2016, Vol. 2 (46), pp. 30–36 (in Russian).
  • Ozarovskaia O. Moei studii. Etiudy po khudozhestvennomu chteniiu (To my Studio. Sketches on the Artistic Recitation). No. 1. Moscow, Petrograd, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1923. (in Russian)
  • Peshkovskii A. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii (Russian Syntax in Scientific Perspective). Moscow, Tipografiia V.M. Sablina Publ., 1914. (in Russian)
  • Polianovskii M. Poet na ekrane: Maiakovskii–kinoakter (Poet on the Screen. Mayakovsky as movie actor). Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel' Publ., 1958 (in Russian).
  • [Sel'vinskii I. et al.] Kakim dolzhen byt' pisatel'skii klub? (What a Writing Club Should Be Like?) Literaturnaia gazeta (Literary Newspaper), no. 3, 7.5.1929, p. 3 (in Russian).
  • Shilov L.A. «Ia slyshal po radio golos Tolstogo...»: Ocherki zvuchashchei literatury (“I heard the voice of Leo Tolstoy on the radio…” Essays on Sounding Literature). Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1989 (in Russian).
  • Shilov L.A. Golosa, zazvuchavshie vnov' (Voices Sounding Anew). Moscow: RUSAKI Publ., 2004 (in Russian).
  • Shuvannikovа E. (ed.) Zvuchashchii Serebrianyi vek. Chitaet poet. (Sounding Silver Age. Poet Reads). Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia Publ., 2018 (in Russian).
  • Tynianov Y. Problema stikhotvornogo iazyka. Stat'i. (The Problem of Verse Language. Articles). Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel' Publ., 1965 (in Russian).
  • Vassena R. K rekonstruktsii istorii i deiatel'nosti Instituta zhivogo slova (1918-1924) (Towards a Reconstruction of the History of the Activity of the Institute of the Living Word (1918-1924)). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2007, no. 86, pp. 79–95 (in Russian).
  • Vsevolodskii-Gerngross V.N. Iskusstvo deklamatsii. (The Art of Declamation). Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo knizhnogo sektora Leningradskogo gosudarstvenno-obshchestvennogo nauchnogo ob"edineniya Publ., 1925 (in Russian).
  • [Vsevolodskii-Gerngross V.N., Lunacharskiy A., et al.] Zapiski Instituta Zhivogo Slova (Proceedings of the Institute of the Living Word). Petersburg, Narodnyi komissariat po prosveshcheniiu Publ., 1919 (in Russian).
  • Vysheslavtseva S. O motornykh impul'sakh stikha (On the Motor Impulses of the Verse). Poetika. Vremennik Slovesnogo otdela Gosudarstvennogo instituta istorii iskusstv (Poetics. Yearbook of the Literary Studies Department of the State Institute for Art History). No. 3. Leningrad, Academia Publ., 1927, pp. 45–62 (in Russian).
  • Zelinskii K. Poeziia kak smysl. Kniga o konstruktivizme (Poetry as Sense. The Book about Constructivism). Moscow, OGI Publ., 2016 (in Russian).
  • Zolotukhin V. Arkhiv S.I. Bernshteina v Dome-muzee M. Tsvetaevoi (S.I. Bernshtein’s Collection in The Memorial House-Museum of M. Tsvetaeva). Brikovskii sbornik. Vypusk 2: Metodologiia i praktika russkogo formalizma (materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii "II-e Brikovskie chteniia: Metodologiia i praktika russkogo formalizma“) (Osip Brik: In Memoriam. Vol.2. Methodology and Practices of Russian Formalism: Papers of the 2nd Osip Brik International Colloquium Methodology and Practices of Russian Formalism). Moscow, Moskovskiy Gosudarstvenniy Universitet Pechati im. Ivana Fedorova Publ., 2014, pp. 89–93 (in Russian).
  • Zolotukhin V.; Schmidt W. (eds.) Zvuchashchaia khudozhestvennaia rech': Raboty Kabineta izucheniia khudozhestvennoi rechi (1923-1930) (Sounding Artistic Speech. Texts and Works of the Institute for Artistic Speech Research (1923—1930)). Moscow, Tri kvadrata Publ., 2018 (in Russian). .


Altai State Institute of Culture, Barnaul, Russia
Department of Choreography, Teacher
Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia
Institute of Arts and Design, PhD Student

From Abductive Logic to Performative Art: Designing the Artistic Communication of a Performer and a Spectator

The article investigates performative art based on the methodological principles of pragmatism. Pragmatism, including the conceptual field of phenomenology (phaneroscopy), puts forward a new paradigm of philosophical logic. Abduction, as a logical model of reasoning, operates with a combination of available knowledge, ideas, which allows the relativity of knowledge, depending on the context in which the subject of research is placed. The theory of abduction, being the logical basis of a pragmatic paradigm, is transformed in avant-garde art practices into the concept of «generative art». The main provisions of abductive reasoning allow us to incorporate logic into artistic activity. In artistic practices, abduction is aimed at considering the modes of vision, memory, imagination, which together form the representation of an art object, event, in the person of the author and the viewer. The article substantiates the use of abduction logic in the theory of speech acts within the framework of genre-style forms of performative art.

Key words: abduction, performative art, avant-garde, speech acts, pragmatism, faneroscopy, generative art, poetic logic, word in performance, intermedial practices.


  • Arutjunova N. D., Paducheva E. V. Sources, problems and categories of pragmatics. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike (New in foreign linguistics), 1985, no. 16, pp. 3–42 (in Russian).
  • Birjukov C. E. About transformational poetics. Trudy Instituta russkogo jazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova (Proceedings of the Vinogradov Russian Language Institute), 2016, no. 7, pp. 253–263 (in Russian).
  • Viner N. Kibernetika, ili Upravlenie i svjaz' v zhivotnom i mashine (Cybernetics, or Management and communication in the animal and machine). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983. 344 p. (in Russian).
  • Galkin D. V. Techno-artistic hybrids or a work of art in the era of its computer production. Gumanitarnaja informatika (Humanitarian Informatics), 2007, no. 3, pp. 40–53 (in Russian).
  • Goldberg R. Iskusstvo performansa. Ot futurizma do nashih dnej (Performance art. From futurism to the present). Мoscow, Izd-vo Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2015. 320 p. (in Russian).
  • Grishchenko Y. S. Pragmatic paradigm in linguistics and classification of speech acts. Philological sciences. Language, speech, speech communication. 2016. Available at: (accessed 08 June 2020).
  • Men'shikov L. A. Intermedia practices in the theory of action art. Vestnik Akademii Russkogo baleta im. A. Ja. Vaganovoj (Bulletin of the Vaganova Russian Ballet Academy), 2019, no. 6, pp. 115–129 (in Russian).
  • Men'shikov L. A. Iskusstvo kak antiiskusstvo (Art as anti-art). St. Petersburg, Izd-vo Akademii Russkogo baleta im. A. Ja. Vaganovoj Publ., 2019. 500 p. (in Russian).
  • Michi D., Dzhontson R. Komp'juter-tvorec (Computer Creator). Moscow, Mir Publ., 1987. 255 p. (in Russian).
  • Mnacakanova E. Vita Breve. Iz pjati knig: Izbrannaja lirika (Vita Breve. In the five books: Selected Lyrics). Perm, Izdatel'stvo Permskogo un-ta Publ., 1994. 116 p. (in Russian).
  • Pirs Ch. Nachala pragmatizma (The beginning of pragmatism). St. Petersburg, Aletejja Publ., 2000. 318 p. (in Russian).
  • Pirs Ch. S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedenija (Selected philosophical works). Moscow, Logos Publ., 2000. 448 p. (in Russian).
  • Fateeva N. A. Otkrytaja struktura. O pojeticheskom jazyke i tekste rubezha XX–XXI vekov (Open structure. On the poetic language and text of the turn of the XX–XXI centuries.). Moscow, Vest-Konsalding Publ., 2006. 160 p. (in Russian).
  • Colabella E. Poetic Logic. 18th Generative art conference Venice 9, 10 and 11 December 2015 organized by: Generative Design Lab, Politecnico di Milano University at Bevilacqua La Masa Foundation, Venice. Available at: (accessed 25 April 2020).
  • Montagnino F. M. Joseph Beuys’ Rediscovery of Man-Nature Relationship: A Pioneering Experience of Open Social Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2018.
  • Soban B. Generative art definitions art, thoughts and views. Generative art – a new kind of art. 2002.
  • Soddu C., Colabella E. Generative Art Futuring Past. Roma: Domus Argenia Publ., 2019. 171 p. (in English).
  • Wilson S. Information Arts. Intersections of Art, Science and Technology. London, MIT Press (Leonardo) Publ., 2002. 968 р. (in English).

Aleksandra DUNAEVA

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
School of Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Laboratory for Historical and Cultural Studies
Senior Researcher, Ph.D. in Arts History

Poetics of oral speech in the theater project with the participation of people with special needs on the example of the play “The Conversations” by “The Apartment” project (St. Petersburg, 2017 – 2019)

The article discusses the inclusive performance “The Conversations” by St. Petersburg theatre project “The Apartment”. The specific materiality (E. Fischer-Lichte) of this performance is documented through the speech of actors with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Down’s Syndrome. The analysis of the poetics of oral speech is carried out through the concept of oral speech as a semiotic object (B. Gasparov). The author also relies on the concept of speech genres by M. Bakhtin. It is concluded that in the framework of the play the “tabooed” speech of people with special needs is “unritualized” (M. Foucault) by means of the theater and becomes social. This shows the coalescence of the artistic and social components of the performance.

Key words: vocal speech, oral speech, “The Apartment” project, social theatre, inclusion, Boris Gasparov, the aesthet-ics of performativity, Erica Fischer-Lichte, Michel Foucault.


  • Bahtin M. “The problem of speech genres. Liter-aturno-kriticheskie stat'I” [Literary-critical arti-cles], Moscow: Hudozhestvennaja literature Publ., 1986. Pp. 428 – 473. (In Russian).
  • Baltaxe C.A. D'Angiola N. “Cohesion in the dis-closure interaction of autistic, specifically lan-guage impaired, and normal children”, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1992, Vol. 22 (1), Р. 1–21.
  • Bray M. “Speech production in people with Down syndrome”, Down Syndrome Research and Practice (Advance Online Publication). 2007.
  • Debor G.-Je. “Psihogeografija” [Psychogeogra-phy]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2017. 110 p. (in Russian).
  • Dunaeva A.O. “Interv'ju s dramaturgom proekta «Kvartira» Jelinoj Petrovoj” [An interview with the playwright of “The Appartment” project Elina Petrova], (unpublished). (In Russian).
  • Dunaeva A.O. “Mysteries of the «Apartment» (on the question of the methodology of theatri-cal study)”. ShAGI (STEPS),2019, T. 5, no.4, pp. 172–185.(In Russian).
  • Dzhurova T. Kadyrova A. “ ‘The Conversa-tions’ in ‘The Apartment’ space”. Blog Peterburgskogo teatral'nogo zhurnala. [St.Petersburg Theatre magazine]. 2018. (In Russian).
  • Eigsti I.M. “Language acquisition in autism spec-trum disorders: A developmental review”, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2011, no.5, Р. 681–691.
  • Fisher-Lihte Je. “Jestetika performativnosti” [Aesthetics of the performative], Moscow, Ka-non+ Publ., 2015. 376 p. (In Russian).
  • Fuko M. “Porjadok diskursa” [The order of dis-course], Volja k istine: po tu storonu znanija, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznyh let. [The will to know: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years], Moscow, Kastal', 1996, pp. 47– 97. (In Russian).
  • Gasparov B.M. ”Ustnaja rech’ kak semioticheskij object” [Oral speech as a semiotic object]. In: Semantika nominacii I semiotika ustnoj rechi. Lingvisticheskaja semantika i semiotika I [Semantics of naming units and the semiotics of oral speech. Linguistic semantics and semiotics I]. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scholary notes of Tartu University]. Tartu, 1978.Vol. 442. Pp.63-113. (In Russian).
  • Israilova M. “What do we see when watching a performance”. 2018. (In Russian).
  • Leman H.-T. “Postdramaticheskij teatr” [Post-dramatic theatre], Moscow: ABCdesign, 2013. 312 p.
  • Lipavskij L. “The Conversations ‘...Sborishhe druzej, ostavlennyh sud'boju’. A. Vvedenskij, L. Lipavskij, Ja. Druskin, D. Harms, N. Olejnikov: ‘chinari’ v tekstah, dokumentah i issledovanijah. V 2-h tomah” [ ‘…The klatch left by fate’. A. Vvedensky, L. Lipavsky, J. Druskin, D. Harms, N. Oleinikov: ‘chinari’ in texts, documents and studies. In 2 volumes.] Ed.. V. N. Sazhin. Vol.1, Moscow: Ladomir Publ, 2000, pp.67–254. (In Russian).
  • Lord C., Paul R. Language and communication in autism. D.J. Cohen, F.R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmen-tal disorders. New York: John Wiley,1997, pp. 195–225.
  • Pesochinskij N.V. “Theatre is right here”. Blog Peterburgskogo teatral'nogo zhurnala. [St.Petersburg Theatre magazine].2018 (In Russian).
  • Rutter M., Mawhood L., Howlin P. Language delay and social development. In P. Fletcher D. Hall (Eds.). Specific speech and language disor-ders in children: Correlates, characteristics, and outcomes.London, Whurr.1992. P. 63–78.
  • Schininà G. Here We Are: Social Theatre and Some Open Questions about Its Developments. TDR, 2004, Vol. 48, No. 3. Р.17–31.
  • Shriberg L.D. Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with highfunctioning autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 2001, no. 44, Р. 1097–1115.
  • Solnceva A. “About the performance”. Blog Pe-terburgskogo teatral'nogo zhurnala [St.Petersburg Theatre magazine].2018. (In Russian).
  • Stoel-Gammon C. Down syndrome phonology: Developmental patterns and intervention strategies, Down Syndrom Research and Practice, 2001, no. 7 (3), p. 93–100.
  • Tjerner V. Simvol i ritual [Symbol and ritual]. Moscow, Glavnaja redakcija vostochnoj literatury izdatel'stva “Nauka” Publ., 1983. 277 p. (In Russian).
  • Vinogradova K.N. “Speech and communication in autism spectrum disorders” In: Autizm i narushenija razvitija [Autism and disturbance of development], 2015, no. 2 (47), pp.17 – 28. (In Russian).
  • Zelenska V. “The Apartment” as a special space. 2018. (In Russian)

Theory of Art


Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Department of Aesthetics, Junior Research Fellow
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow, Russia
The Department of Humanitarian Sciences
PhD student of the School of Philosophy

Membrane, Integument, Boundary: Im (material) and Topological Aspects of Image

This paper explores the issue of material aspects of image. The inquiry takes into account the new materialism’s perspective which implies rethinking the concept of matter: to abandon traditional understanding of the material as a passive subject of the active form, which only receives different effects and never produces any. The material turn has an impact on visual and image studies. The relationships between image and its material support has always seemed complicated and problematic. This paper explores the traditionally marked gap between image and its material carrier as well as a physical space filled with material bodies. The examination is based on the main concepts of projective geometry. The projective geometry’s framework is fairly relevant here due to its deep connection with the visual and art. The gap is articulated and described on this geometry basis, at the same time, the attempts are made to rethink and eliminate it. In order to do so, the paper provides several examples of blurring the boundary between image and its material surrounding that become possible due to new materialism’s shift which redefines matter and provides it with agency. Furthermore, the idea of the image itself as a boundary is also considered. As such a border the image separates inner and outer, res cogitans and res extensa, immanent and transcendent. Topological and geometric examination shows that this dividing surface that is the image is non-oriented which means it has only one side.

Key words: Image, picture, visual studies, new materialism, agency, projective geometry, projective plane, topology, cross-cap, non-oriented surfaces, boundary.


  • Alexander, J. C. «Iconic experience in art and life: Surface/depth beginning with Giacometti’s Standing Woman», Theory, Culture & Society, 2008, No. 25(5), pp. 1–19.
  • Andersen K. The Geometry of an Art. The History of the Mathematical Theory of Perspective from Alberti to Monge. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2007. 814 p.
  • Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2007. 525 p.
  • Barad ,K. «Agential Realism», in: Opiti nechelovecheskogo gosterpiimstva [The Experienses of Non-human Hospitality], Eds. M. Kramar, K. Sarkisov. Moscow: V-A-C press, 2018, pp. 42–121
  • Belting H. «Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology», Critical Inquiry 31 — 2005 — pp. 302—319.
  • Bennett, J. «Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things», trans. by A. Sarkisyanc. Perm: HylePress, 2018. 220 p.
  • Bruno, G. Surface: Matters of aesthetics, materiality, and media. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014. 277 p.
  • Coccia, E. «Sensible life: A micro-ontology of the image.» New York: Fordham University Press, 2016. 127 p.
  • Gaboury J. «Hidden Surface Problems: On the Digital Image as Material Object», Journal of Visual Culture, 2015, No. 14(1), pp. 40−60.
  • Harris J. L., Taylor P. A. Digital Matters. Theory and culture of the matrix. London, New York: Routledge, 2005. 223 p.
  • Hyperbolic Non-Euclidean World ( (дата обращения: 8.08.2020).
  • Inishev I. «Embedded Creativity: Structural Interconnections between Materiality, Visuality, and Agency in Everyday Perceptual Settings», Creativity studies, 2018, Vol. 11, pp. 70—84.
  • Inishev I. N. «Vzaimosvyaz' material'nogo i smyslovogo v ikonicheskom opyte» [The Relationship between the Material and the Semantic in the Iconic Experience], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya, 2011, No. 4(16), pp. 86—93.
  • Lacan, J. «Mirror Stage», in: The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious, or Reason Since Freud, trans. by A. K. Chernoglazov, M. A. Titova. Moscow: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, Logos,1997. pp. 7—15.
  • Lacan, J. «The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis», trans. by A. K. Chernoglazov. Moscow: Gnozis, Logos, 2004. 304 p.
  • MacDougall D. The Corporeal Image. Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006. 326 p.
  • Marion, J.-L. «The Crossing of the Visible», in: Marion, J.-L. The Crossing of the Visible, trans. by N. Sosna. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya, 2010. pp. 11—52.
  • Meillassoux, Q. «After Finitude: An Essay On The Necessity Of Contingency», trans. by L. Medvedeva. Yekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj, 2015. 196 p.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. «Eye and Mind», trans. by A. V. Gustyr’. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1992. 63 p.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. «The Visible and the Invisible», trans. by O. N. Shpargi. Minsk: Logvinov, 2006. 400 p.
  • Nancy J.-L. «The Image — the Distinct», in: The Ground of Image, trans. by J. Fort. N.Y.: Fordham University Press, 2005. pp. 1—14.
  • Sosna N. N. «Obraz i material'noe: k transformacii svyazej» [Image and Material: to Transform Relationships], Hudozhestvennyj zhurnal, 2015, No. 94.
  • Sosinsky, A. «Geometries», trans. by B. R. Frenkin. Moscow: MCCME, 2017. 263 p. 24. Thacker, E. «In the Dust of This Planet», trans. by A. Ivanov. Perm: HylePress, 2017. 184 p.
  • Visuality/Materiality. images, Objects and Practices. (Eds.) Rose G., Tolia-Kelly D. P. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2012. 210 p.
  • Volberg, O.A. «Osnovnii idei proektivnoi geometrii» [Basic Ideas of Projective Geometry]. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom «LIBRKOM», 2009. 192 p. 27. What if Culture was Nature all Along? (Ed.) Kirby V. Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2017. 273 p.
  • Woodard B. «Slime Dynamics», trans. by D. Khamis. Perm: HylePress, 2016. 124 p.


St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Faculty of Arts, Associate Professor, PhD in Arts History

«A Scene in a Library»: to the Problem of Object and to the Rhetoric of Photography

This article is focused on «A Scene in a Library» — the photography of William Henry Fox Talbot, which was published in 1844 in the book «The Pencil of Nature» — the first book about photography and the first book with photographic illustrations. The text recognized the photograph of Talbot as an important precedent. «A Scene in a Library» combined semantic and pictorial principles inherited from the culture of the XVII – XVIII centuries with the concepts that shape the visual system and rhetoric of photography of the XX – XXI centuries. “Scene in the library” outlined the problem of the correlation between visual and verbal, making the rhetoric of Talbot’s image a fragment of the photographic system. The photography was revealed as part of hidden speech and latent conversation. This snapshot became one of the first images that touched the problem of invisible as the part of the semantic program of photography. It became the central element of the modern discussion on photography. «A Scene in a Library» has become one of the key elements in the modern discussion on photography, becoming an appeal to the hidden rhetoric connected with its functional ambiguity and semantic uncertainty. This study examines the visual rhetoric of «A Scene in a Library», analyzes its visual program and semantic vector.

Key words: William Henry Fox Talbot, photography, calotype, Rosalind Krauss, «A Scene in a Library», «The Pencil of Nature».


  • Vasil'eva E. Fotografija i Vnelogicheskaja Forma (Photography and Non-Logical Form). Moscow, New Literary Review Publ., 2019. — 312 p. (in Russian)
  • Vasil'eva E. Early City Photography: to the Question of the Iconography of Space. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury (International Journal of Cultural Research). 2019. № 4 (37). P. 65-86. (in Russian)
  • Vasil'eva E. The figure of Sublime and the crisis of the ideology of the New Age. Teorija mody: telo, odezhda, kul’tura (Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture). 2018. № 47. P.10 - 29. (in Russian)
  • Vasil'eva E. The Idea of Sign and the Principle of Exchange in the Field of Photography and in the System of Language. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 15. Iskusstvovedenie (Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 15. Art Criticism). 2016. N. 1. P. 4–33. (in Russian)
  • Vasil'eva E. The Phenomenon of Womanshood and the Figure of Sacred. Teorija mody: telo, odezhda, kul’tura (Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture). 2016. № 42. P. 160 - 189. (in Russian)
  • Vasil'eva E. Susan Sontag on Photography: the Idea of Beauty and the Problem of Norm. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 15. Iskusstvovedenie (Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 15. Art Criticism). 2014. N. 3. P. 64–80. (in Russian)
  • Vasil'eva E. Character and Mask in the Photography of the XX Century. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 15. Iskusstvovedenie (Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 15. Art Criticism). 2012. N. 4. P. 175-186. (in Russian)
  • Venkova A. The Transgression of Medium in the Philosophy of Dietmar Camper and the Critical theory of Rosalind Krauss. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury (International Journal of Cultural Research). 2010. № 1. P. 129–137. (in Russian)
  • Vipper B. Problema i razvitie natjurmorta (The Problem and the Development of Still Life). (1922). Saint Petersburg: Classic Alphabet, 2005. — 384 p. (in Russian)
  • Danijel' M. Still life: to the Background of the Genre // Vipper B. Problema i razvitie natjurmorta (The Problem and the Development of Still Life). (1922). Saint Petersburg: Classic Alphabet, 2005, p. 8 — 22. (in Russian)
  • Podoroga V. Vopros o veshhi. Opyty po analiticheskoj antropologii (Question about things. Experiments in analytical anthropology). Moscow, «Grundrisse», 2016. — 348 p. (in Russian)
  • Stepanov M. Design and Revolution: Wilhem Flusser on the Art of Everyday. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury (International Journal of Cultural Research). 2016, № 4 (25). С. 146–151. (in Russian)
  • Barthes R. Rhétorique de l’image // Communication, 1964, № 4, pp. 41-42.
  • Barthes R. Le mythe, aujourd'hu // Barthes R. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil, 1957. P.179-233.
  • Batchen G. William Henry Fox Talbot. London: Phaidon, 2008. — 128 p.
  • Baudrillard J. La Photographie ou l’Écriture de la Lumiere: Litteralite de l’Image // L’Echange Im-possible. Paris: Galilée, 1999. P. 175–184.
  • Believe not thine eyes. Trompe-l'œil in art: Exhibition catalogue. SPb.: The State Hermitage Museum, 2018. – 504 с.
  • Benjamin W. L’œuvre d’art à l’époque de sa reproduction mécanisée (Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit) // Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. 5, 1936, Heft 1, S. 40–66.
  • Carr P. The Night of the «Big Wind». The Night of the Big Wind. Belfast: White Row Press, 1993. — 140 p.
  • Brusius M., Dean K., Ramalingam C. William Henry Fox Talbot: beyond photography. New Haven: Yale Center for British Art, 2013. — 320 p.
  • The Correspondence of William Henry Fox Talbot.
  • Derrida J. De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1967. — 445 p.
  • Flusser V. Für eine Philosophie der Fotografie. Göttingen: European Photography, 1997. — 202 s.
  • Forsythe, W., Breen C., Callaghan C., McConkey R. Historic storms and shipwrecks in Ireland: a preliminary survey of severe synoptic conditions as a causal factor in underwater archaeology // International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 2000, N 29 (2), p. 247–259.
  • Foucault M. L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969. — 288 p.
  • Foucault M. Les Mots et les Choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris, Gallimard, 1966. — 405 p.
  • Galassi P. Before photography painting and the invention of photography. New-York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1981. — 160 p.
  • Jammes A. William H. Fox Talbot: inventor of the negative-positive process, New York, Collier Books, 1973. — 130 p.
  • Krauss R. Tracing Nadar // October. 1978, N 5, pp. 29-47.
  • Lacan J. Le séminaire. Livre XI. Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. (1964). Paris: Le Seuil, 1973. — 320 p.
  • Lanzi L. La Storia Pittorica dell’Italia. I-II, Bassano del Grappa, Remondini, 1795-1796. — 950 p.
  • Maimon V. Singular Images, Failed Copies: William Henry Fox Talbot and the Early Photograph. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press, 2015. — 250 p.
  • Meggs, Philip B., Purvis, Alston W. Graphic Design and the Industrial Revolution. / History of Graphic Design. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2006. p.152-153.
  • Newhall B. On photography: a source book of photo history in facsimile. New Yorl: Century House, 1956. — 112 p.
  • Newhall B. Photography and the book: delivered on the occasion of the eighth Bromsen lecture, May 3, 1980, Trustees of the Public Library of the City of Boston, 1983. — 52 p.
  • The Philosophical Magazine. London: Taylor & Francis, 1798 - Pliny the Elder. Natural History. 10 volumes. The Loeb classical library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938–1962. — 944 p.
  • Roberts R. Images and artefacts: William Henry Fox Talbot and 'The Museum» // Artefact, 2004, vol. 4. London: Science Museum, p. 4-20.
  • Schaaf L. The Photographic Art of William Henry Fox Talbot. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. — 264 p.
  • Schaaf L. Out of the Shadows: Herschel, Talbot, and the Invention of Photography. London: Yale University Press, 1992.
  • Schaaf L .A Scene in a Library: Part One – the Literality. The William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonee. 24th June 2016.
  • Schaaf L. Happy Birthday to The Pencil of Nature. The William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonee. 24th June 2016.
  • Schaaf L. The Peripatetic Shelves. The William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonee. 10th June 2016.
  • Schaaf L. Three Novembers. he William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonee. 13th November 2015.
  • Sekula A. The Body and the Archive // October, 1986, N 39, pp. 3-64.
  • Sontag S. On photography. New York: Farrar; Straus & Giroux, 1977. — 165 p.
  • Spike J. Giuseppe Maria Crespi and the Emergence of Genre Painting in Italy. Fort Worth: Kimball Museum of Art, 1986. — 245 p.
  • Talbot W. H. F. The Pencil of Nature: in 6 parts. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Long-mans, 1844–1846. Parts 1–6. XXIV p.
  • Talbot W. H. F. Illustrations of the Antiquity of the Book of Genesis. London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1839. — 80 p.
  • Talbot W. H. F. Hermes, or Classical and Antiquarian Researches. London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1838. — 100 p.
  • The William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonee.
  • Watson R. Rappaport H. Capturing the Light. London: Macmillan, 2013. — 320 p.
  • Weather in History 1800 to 1849 AD.
  • Wilkinson J. Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians. Three volumes. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street, 1837. — 950 p.


Alexandra VOLODINA

The Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Junior Research Fellow, PhD in Philosophy

Dynamic Sign and the Living Material of Contemporaneity

This paper examines the theoretical approach to dynamic sign presented in a book by Helen Petrovsky Disturbance of the Sign, or, Culture Against Transcendence. This approach is centered on the interpretation of the sign as a “material body of alterations”. It follows Pierce’s semiotic theory that unfolds in a numerous philosophical, anthropological and biosemiotic projects briefly summarized in this paper. Reflecting on the living corporality of signs and on their modi operandi which fall out of the logic of visual representation, encoding, narrativization or duplication of the world as an object, holds a great potential to study the contemporary art processes (in poetry, photography and cinema as well as in a broader social and cultural landscape). The subjects of research here are very diverse because the analysis is focused not on their ontological qualities but on their similar dynamics of existence and the processes of designation conceptualized as transitions and relations. This paper reviews the research strategies presented in aforementioned book and discusses the importance of these ideas in the context of the currently important semiotic approaches and philosophical tendencies.

Key words: sign, affect, relation, pathos formula, structures of feeling, interpretant, contemporary culture, photography, biosemiotics, Helen Petrovsky, Gilles Deleuze, Charles Sanders Peirce, Eduardo Kohn, Tim Ingold.


  • Barzakh A. "Ritual'noe obshchenie liubitelei russkoi slovesnosti". Ob odnom stikhotvorenii Arkadiia Dragomoshchenko ("Ceremonial interaction between the admirers of Russian literature". On a certain poem by Arkadiy Dragomoshchenko). Vozdukh, 2006. №2. URL: (In Russian).
  • Burrio N. Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Presses du réel, 2002. 128 p.
  • Glazova A. O roste poeticheskoi real'nosti. "Nasturtsiia kak sobytie" Osipa Mandel'shtama i "nasturtsiia v slovesnom svoem sostave" Arkadiia Dragomoshchenko (On the growth of poetic reality. Osip Mandelshtam’s "nasturtium as an event" and Arkadiy Dragomoshchenko "nasturtium in its verbal composition"). Vozdukh, 2016. №2. URL: (In Russian).
  • Deleuze, G., Guattari F. Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2: Mille plateau. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1980. 648 p.
  • Deleuze G. Spinoza. Paris: PUF, 1970. 126 p.
  • Ingold T. Culture, nature, environment: steps to an ecology of life. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge, 2000. pp. 13–27.
  • Kohn E. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013. 288 p.
  • Petrovskaia E. Vozmushchenie znaka. Kul'tura protiv transtsendentsii (Disturbance of the Sign, or, Culture Against Transcendence). M.: Common place, 2019. 288 p. (In Russian).
  • Petrovskaia E. Vyrazitel'noe i izobrazitel'noe (Expressive and pictorial). Novaia filosofskaia entsiklopediia: in 4 volumes. Vol. 1. 744 p. (In Russian).
  • Spinoza B. The Collected Writings of Spinoza. Vol. 1. Transl. by Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985. 752 p.
  • Iampol'skii M. Iz khaosa (Dragomoshchenko: poeziia, fotografiia, filosofiia) (From the khaos (Dragomoshchenko: poetry, photography, philosophy). SPb.: Seans, 2015. 280 p. (In Russian).
  • Cassirer E. The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science, and History since Hegel. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950. 352 p.
  • Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Pierce / Ed. by Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960. Vol. 1 and 2. 962 p.
  • Guattari F. Soft Subversions. Texts and Interviews 1977–1985. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Semiotext(e), 2009. 341 p.
  • Haraway D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. Autumn, 1988. Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 575–599.
  • Hoffmeyer J. The Semiotics of Nature: Code-Duality // Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary / Ed. by D. Favareau. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. pp. 583–628.
  • Holbraad M., Pedersen M.A., Viveiros de Castro E. The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions // Fieldsights – Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology Online. January 13, 2014.
  • Massumi B. Introduction. Like a Thought // A Shock to Thought : Expression After Deleuze and Guattari / Ed. by B. Massumi. New York, London: Routledge, 2002. pp. xiii–xxxix.
  • Mondzain M.-J. Image, icone, economie. Les sources byzantines de l’imaginaire contemporain. Paris: Seuil, 1996. 299 p.
  • Semon R. The Mneme / Trans. by L. Simon. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.; New York: The Macmillan Company, 1921. 304 p.


К проблеме наездницы русского постмодернизма

Sunday, 22 September 2013 | Olga Kirillova
Посвящается В. Л. Рабиновичу Насмерть загоню? Не бойся — ты же, брат, не Брут: Смерть мала и ненадолго, Цезарь...
Comment: 1

Рецензия на книгу: Попова Д.Л Сакральная семиосфера северного города. - Архангельск, 2015

Saturday, 28 October 2017 | Alexander Lyusiy
Сакральная семиосфера северного города: монография/Д.Л.Попова; М-во образования и науки Российской Федер,...
Comments: 0

Арзрум, да не тот. Империобол как предчувствие футболистической революции

Tuesday, 26 June 2012 | Alexander Lyusiy
В основе материала — выступление автора на Международном конгрессе «Россия и Польша: память...
Comments: 0

Reminder about Humbert

Thursday, 05 April 2012 | Alexander Lyusiy
There are no translations available yet.
Comments: 0

There are no translations available yet

Friday, 01 July 2011 | Irina Sokolova
There are no translations available yet
Comments: 0

Oil — a metaphor for culture

Tuesday, 15 November 2011 | Anna Rileva
There are no translations available yet
Comments: 2

The Chronotope of Illustrated Magazine

Friday, 14 January 2011 | Margarita Gudova
The article deals with the industry glossy magazines as an agent of modernization of consciousness and the transition from the patriarchal and industrial models to the identification of...
Comments: 3

There are no translations available yet

Tuesday, 15 November 2011 | Alexey Krivolap
There are no translations available yet
Comment: 1