Expressive Power of Assistive Technologies in Artistic Practices – МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ

Buy

Alexandra V. VOLODINA
The Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 109240
Research Fellow
PhD in Philosophy
e-mail: sasha.volodina@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0002-8685-321X

Expressive Power of Assistive Technologies in Artistic Practices

Abstract: The article is devoted to the theoretical study of assistive technologies and practices (i.e. tools designed to support people with disabilities or severe health conditions) as an integral part of many projects in the field of contemporary visual arts (exhibitions, art environments and performances). It is shown that assistive technologies can serve as entry points for different ways of perceiving the world by disabled and non-disabled people. Thus, assistive technologies help create a new space for all audiences, where a meeting with the other can take place without the presumption of a complete understanding of the other. The cultural, ethical and philosophical significance of such spaces (which we conceptualize as situations of the “third experience”) is revealed both by means of specific artistic projects and of the theoretical developments of disability studies: the concept of cripistemology, criticism of the idea of “compulsory able-bodiedness” by Robert McRuer, the idea of “opacity” by Edouard Glissant. The “third experience” is proposed for use as an open concept that does not have a strict definition, but allows one to notice or design such spaces in which differences could be expressed without the risk of being homogenized, and in which the “presumption of opacity” that is so important for equal communication between people with different lived experiences. Such spaces and situations, built in the context of disability culture, can serve a critical function and resist the idea of “compulsory able-bodiedness”. The considerations presented in the article can be of practical value for research and curatorial work not only in the field of inclusion, but also in the field of contemporary art in general.

Key words: disability studies, assistive technology, inclusion, accessibility, contemporary art, shared experience.

References:

Jackson, L., Haagaard, A., Williams, R. (2022) Disability Dongle. Platypus. https://blog.castac.org/2022/04/disability-dongle/ (Accessed: June 30, 2023).
Lee Clark, J. (2021). Against Access. In McSweeney’s 64. The Audio Issue. https://audio.mcsweeneys.net/transcripts/against_access.html (Accessed: June 30, 2023).
Valla, L. (1989). Ob istinnom i lozhnom blage [Of the True and the False Good]. In L. Valla. Ob istinnom i lozhnom blage. O svobode voli [Of the True and the False Good. Of Free Will]. Nauka. 65–266. (In Russian).
Siebers, T. (2019). Returning the Social to the Social Model. In D.T. Mitchell, S. Antebi & S.L. Snyder (Eds.). The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect. University of Michigan Press. 39–47.
de Beauvoir, S. (1973). The Second Sex. Trans. E.M. Parshley. Vintage. 814 p.
Meet Disabled Dancers Alice Sheppard & Laurel Lawson. Now This Originals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjLRPVnmY30 (Accessed: June 30, 2023).
Virdee, A., Botero, H.N., Wilk, J., and Lin, Y.Y. (2021). Disabled Artists Interview on Cyborgs and Working with Art and Technology. Able Zine. Issue 2. 117–126.
Haraway, D. (2005). Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiia i sotsialisticheskii feminizm 1980-kh gg. [A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and. Socialist Feminism in the 1980s]. In Gendernaia teoriia i iskusstvo. Antologiia: 1970–2000 [Gender Theory and Art. Anthology: 1970–2000]. ROSSPEN. 322–377. (In Russian).
Dinsmoor, S.P. (1927). Pictorial History of the Cabin Home in Garden of Eden. http://www.gardenofedenlucas.org/pictorial-history (Accessed: June 30, 2023).
McRuer, R. (2006). Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York University Press. 304 p.
Kinnucan, M. (2014). An Interview with Yasmin Nair, Part Two: The Ideal Neoliberal Subject is the Subject of Trauma. Hypocrite Reader. Issue 43. http://hypocritereader.com/43/yasmin-nair-two (Accessed: June 30, 2023).
Glissant, É. (2006). For Opacity. In É. Glissant. Poetics of Relation. Trans. B. Wing and A. Arbor. Michigan University Press. 226 p.
Gibilisco, P. (2011). The Politics of Disability: A Need for a Just Society Inclusive of People with Disabilities. CCB Publishing. 342 p.
Gaeta, A. (2023). Diagnostic advertisements: The phantom disabilities created by social media surveillance. First Monday. 28(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i1.12913 (Accessed: June 30, 2023).
Johnson, M.L., and McRuer, R. (2014). Cripistemologies. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies. 8.2. 127–147.
Wylie, A. (2003). Why Standpoints Matter. In Robert Figueroa; Sandra Harding (Eds.). Science and Other Cultures. Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge. 26–48.
Johnson, M.L., and McRuer, R. (2014). Proliferating Cripistemologies. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies. 8.2. 149–169.

For Citation:

Volodina, A. (2023) Expressive Power of Assistive Technologies in Artistic Practices. International Journal of Cultural Research, 3 (52). 78–92. DOI: 10.52173/2079-1100_2023_3_78

DOI: 10.52173/2079-1100_2023_3_78