ISSN 2079-1100

International Journal of Cultural Research
  • English
  • Русский
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Aims and Scope. Focus
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Publisher
    • Indexing. Libraries
    • Partners
  • For Authors
    • Authors Guide
    • Peer-Review
    • Retraction. Conflict of Interest
  • Issues
  • Subscription
  • Contacts
  1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. № 4(61) 2025
  4. Paniotova, T. (2025) Fantastic Spaces of Utopia
Buy
Taisiya S. PANIOTOVA
Southern Federal University
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation
Institute of Philosophy and Social and Political Studies, Professor
Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy
e-mail: tspaniotova@sfedu.ru
ORCID: 0000-0003-2529-9216

Paniotova, T. (2025) Fantastic Spaces of Utopia

Abstract: This article is devoted to the construction of fantastic spaces as an integral part of utopian creativity. In myths, legends, and folktales, fantastic worlds were situated in various ideal loci. At the dawn of the modern age, such a place – at once nonexistent (u-topos) and blissful (eu-topos) – became known as utopia. With the geographic discoveries and the revival of urban life in Europe, physical space was transformed into an object of geographical description (islands, continents) and detailed geometrical planning (ideal city projects). In classical utopias (T. More, T. Campanella), the reception of new ideological attitudes manifested in the form of geographical isolationism and urbanism. The island (isla) ensured the inaccessibility and preservation of the ideal social order; the city represented harmony between aesthetic form and political structure. The author argues that the discovery of new worlds stimulated a transformation in the ways fantastic spaces were constructed. Drawing on the texts of T. More, T. Campanella, and the activities of their followers in the New World, the article reveals new cognitive strategies of spatial imagination–specifically, the incorporation of factual elements alongside fictional ones; the reinterpretation of classical heritage in the context of geographical and scientific discoveries; and more. As a result, fantastic space is conceived as an interweaving of the credible and the incredible, the known and the unknown, the discovered and the yet-to-be discovered, belonging simultaneously to the present and to the future. Emerging under the influence of geographical discoveries and later transplanted to the American continent, Renaissance utopia engaged in the appropriation and harmonization of the real physical space of the Americas.

Key words: utopia, fantastic space, island, city, More, Campanella, Vasco de Quiroga.

References:
  • Ainsa, F. (1999). La reconstrucción de la utopía. México: Correo de la UNESCO, 238. (In Spanish)
  • Chavaroche, O., & Billioud, J.-M. (2021). Atlas der utopischen Welten: 82 Visionen der Menschheit. Stuttgart: Franckh‑Kosmos, 256. (In German)
  • Gadea Grau, J. (2017). Utopía y verdad (1516–2016): De la ficción literaria a la realidad geográfica e histórica: una interpretación verista del libro Utopía de Thomas Moro. In Jiménez García, E. et al. (Eds.), Hermenéutica, educación y sociedad: en los albores de la utopía. ACCI (Asoc. Cultural y Científica Iberoameric.), 87–128. (In Spanish)
  • Hiatt, A. (2008). Terra incognita: Mapping the Antipodes before 1600. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 298.
  • Iglesias García, R. & Paniotova, T. S. (2021). “Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee” v utopiiakh sovremennogo iskusstva [“Our posthuman future” in utopias of contemporary art]. Chelovek, 32(4), 149–171. (In Russian)
  • Klocker, D. E. (2022). Construyendo Utopía: de la teoría a la praxis. Isegoría, 66, e21. (In Spanish)
  • Krotz, E. (2019). La protoantropología de Tomás Moro: Un redescubrimiento a 500 años de la primera publicación de Utopía. Revista de El Colegio de San Luis, 9(20), 51–76. (In Spanish)
  • Martinez, C. (2024). Los no-lugares en la construcción de la modernidad. Utopía, lo verosímil y lo posible. Nueva Sociedad, 309, 60–69. (In Spanish)
  • Martinez Estrada, E. (1963). El Nuevo Mundo, la isla de Utopía y la isla de Cuba. Cuadernos americanos, 2, 89–122. (In Spanish)
  • Martynov, D. E. (2012). Russkoe pole utopii: obzor nachala XXI veka [The Russian field of utopias: A review of the early 21st century]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kultury, 4(9), 86–93. (In Russian)
  • Misseri, L. (2016). Evantropia and Dysantropia: A Possible New Stage in the History of Utopias. In K. Olkusz et al. (Eds.), More after More: Essays commemorating the five-hundredth anniversary of Thomas More’s Utopia. Kraków: Facta Ficta Research Centre, 26–42.
  • Misseri, L. E. (2009). Identidad y alteridad en el imaginario utópico americano. Agora Philosophica, 10, 130–143. (In Spanish)
  • Morgan, A. E. (1946). Nowheare was somewhere: How History makes Utopias and How Utopias make History. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 234.
  • Mumford, L. (1965). Utopia, the city and the machine. Daedalus, 94(2), 271–292.
  • Onetto Pavez, M. (2015). La utopía de Moro y la Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego, ¿Una equivalencia posible? Magallania, 43(1), 37–51. (In Spanish)
  • Padrón, R. (2002). Mapping Plus Ultra: Cartography, Space, and Hispanic Modernity. Representations, 79, 28–60. (In Spanish)
  • Paniotova, T. S. (2004). Utopiia v prostranstve dialoga kul’tur [Utopia in the space of cultural dialogue]. Rostov-on-Don: RGU Publ., 303. (In Russian)
  • Paniotova, T. S. (2016). Real’noe i fantasticheskoe v “Utopii” T. Mora [The real and the fantastic in Thomas More’s Utopia]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, (3), 117–132. (In Russian)
  • Paniotova, T. S. (2023). Ontologiia utopii: konstruirovanie voobrazhaemogo prostranstva [Ontology of utopia: Constructing imaginary space]. Nauchnaia mysl’ Kavkaza, (3), 14–21. (In Russian)
  • Paniotova, T. S., & Romanenko, M. A. (2021). Remembering the future: Traces of tradition in innovative projects of Soviet Constructivism. In Monteiro, M. D. R., Kong, M. S. M., & Neto, M. J. P. (Eds.), Tradition and Innovation. London: CRC Press, 57–62.
  • Panchenko, D. (2024). Uiutopiia rimskikh vill: pis’ma Pliniia Mladshego v gumanisticheskoi perspective [“Uytopia” of Roman villas: The letters of Pliny the Younger in a humanist perspective]. Logos, 34(6), 135–155. (In Russian)
  • Pro, J., & Di Minico, E. (Eds.) (2022). Comunidades intencionales: Utopías concretas en la Historia. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 202. (In Spanish)
  • Romanenko, M. A., & Khvostikova, V. O. (2023). Kontury budushchego v sovetskoi gradostroitel’noi utopii [Contours of the future in Soviet urban utopia]. Abyss (Voprosy filosofii, politologii i sotsial’noi antropologii), (26), 45–53. (In Russian)
  • Ruban, D. A. (2022). Ekologicheskie aspekty utopii: kartograficheskie obrazy i turisticheskii eksperiment [Ecological aspects of utopia: Cartographic images and a tourism experiment]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, (5), 110–118. (In Russian)
  • Savluchinskaia, A. D. (2024). Gorod budushchego v avangardistskikh utopiiakh 1920–30-kh gg. XX veka [The city of the future in avant-garde utopias of the 1920–30s]. Abyss (Voprosy filosofii, politologii i sotsial’noi antropologii), (30), 57–68. (In Russian)
  • Suslov, M. D. (2013). Utopiia kak predmet sovremennykh issledovanii na Zapade i v Rossii [Utopia as a subject of contemporary research in the West and in Russia]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia: Literaturovedenie. Iazykoznanie. Kul’turologiia, (7), 34–41. (In Russian)
  • Zhgileva, L. A. (2024). Diskursivnoe prostranstvo izucheniia fenomena utopii v sovremennoi Rossii: Paradigmal’nyi analiz [Discursive space of studying utopia in contemporary Russia: A paradigmatic analysis]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 24(1), 85–98. (In Russian)
  • Zheltikova, I. V. (2022). Kontury rossiiskikh utopii, ili granitsy mezhdu pozitivnymi i negativnymi voobrazhaemymi mirami [Contours of Russian utopias, or boundaries between positive and negative imagined worlds]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, (5), 75–85. (In Russian)
  • More, T. (2001). Zolotaia kniga, stol’ zhe poleznaia, kak zabavnaia, o nailuchshem ustroistve gosudarstva i o novom ostrove Utopii [The golden book, as useful as it is amusing, about the best state system and the new island of Utopia]. In Erasmus of Rotterdam. Vospitanie khristianskogo gosudaria, Zhaloba mira, otovsiudu izgnannogo i povsiudu sokrushennogo, Pokhval’noe slovo gluposti [The education of a Christian prince, The complaint of peace, everywhere exiled and everywhere crushed, In praise of folly]. Moscow: Mysl’, 229–335. (In Russian)
  • Günther, G. (1991). Zhanrovye problemy utopii i “Chevengur” A. Platonova [Genre problems of utopia and Platonov’s Chevengur]. In Utopiia i utopicheskoe myshlenie. Moscow: Progress, 252–277. (In Russian)
  • Campanella, T. (1947). Gorod Solntsa [The City of the Sun]. Moscow–Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 175. (In Russian)
For Citation:

Paniotova, T. (2025) Fantastic Spaces of Utopia. International Journal of Cultural Research, 4 (61). 6–19. DOI: 10.52173/2079-1100_2025_4_6


DOI: 10.52173/2079-1100_2025_4_6

Current Issue
№ 4(61) 2025

  • Покупка статьи





    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL RESEARCH

    • Реквизиты организации
    • ПОЛЬЗОВАТЕЛЬСКОЕ СОГЛАШЕНИЕ
    • ПОЛИТИКА КОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТИ

    © All rights reserved. Use of materials is possible only with official permission
    of the publisher and with obligatory reference to the «International Journal of Cultural Research»