Anastasia V. GOLUBINSKAYA Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
23 Prospekt Gagarina (Gagarin Avenue), Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Russian Federation
Department of Social Security and Humanitarian Technologies, Associate Professor
PhD (Philosophy)
e-mail: golub@unn.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-7119-3968
Critical Thinking in Popular Culture Context: the Transformation of the Image and the Differentiation of the ConceptAbstract: Just a few decades ago, one could predict the content of a text following a title that combined terms such as "popular culture" and "critical thinking". The traditional viewpoint described critical thinking as something that diminishes or deteriorates under the influence of pop culture, and as something that is reflected in a decreased interest in popular culture itself. Today, this stance does not seem as confident. Firstly, because popular culture is acquiring a niche character, catering to different consumers with various ways of thinking, and thereby becoming a platform for the dissemination of ideas and principles of critical thinking (for example, science festivals). Secondly, because the objects of popular culture themselves are being involved in the educational process as tools and mediators of certain modes of thinking. As noted in this article, the evolution of the relationship between popular culture and critical thinking has developed gradually: initially, this relationship was mutually negating, then popular culture was redefined as a neutral participant in the process of learning critical thinking, and today it is beginning to be recognized as an active mediator in this process. Identifying the specific characteristics of the third, i.e., current stage, is the goal of this article.
As key manifestations of the "active participation" of popular culture in the processes of constructing the image of a critical thinker, the transformation and differentiation of this image are considered. It is shown that within the context of popular culture, critical thinking, usually interpreted through specific cognitive operations, is transformed into what is called a "black box", that is, a process with known initial conditions and final conclusions but inaccessible for observation and explanation by intermediate transformations. Differentiation is manifested in how critical thinking is defined depending on the sociocultural context and the community for which this definition is developed. For mainstream Western culture, critical thinking is associated with ideals of scientific rationality, but beyond its boundaries, critical thinking is defined through the ability to come to an agreement, articulate one's thoughts in mutual dialogue, and the degree of multicultural receptivity. Representations of these descriptions can be found in popular culture oriented towards the respective community.
Key words: critical thinking, popular culture, critical thinking transformation, critical thinking differentiation, pop-science, science popularization.
References:
- Mukerji, C., Schudson, M. (Eds.). (1991). Rethinking popular culture: contempory perspectives in cultural studies. Univ of California Press.
- Jubas, K. (2023). Using popular culture in professional education to foster critical curiosity and learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 55(1), 240–258. 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2022.2114690
- Clark, I. L. (2022). Imitation, Critical Thinking, and Identity. In Writing, Imitation, and Performance, 60–75. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196815
- Demerath, L. (2002). Epistemological culture theory: A micro theory of the origin and maintenance of culture. Sociological Theory, 20(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.001591/1467-9558.00159
- Demerath, L. (2006). Epistemological identity theory: Reconceptualizing commitment as self-knowledge. Sociological Spectrum, 26(5), 491–517. http://doi.org/10.1080/02732170600786208
- Demerath, L. (2012). Explaining culture: The social pursuit of subjective order. Lexington Books.
- Ligocki, D., Wilkins, M. A. (2020). The Truth We Can’t Afford to Ignore: Popular Culture, Media Influence, and the Role of Public School. In Participatory Literacy Practices for P-12 Classrooms in the Digital Age, 57–72. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0000-2.ch004
- Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
- Bykova, A.S., Sakharova, N.S., Kirillova, I.N. (2021). Sovremennye tendencii v traktovke ponyatiya «kriticheskoe myshlenie» [Modern tendencies of interpreting the concept of “critical thinking”]. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, 3 (231), 6–11.
- Koreshnikova, Y.N. (2021). Organizacionnye i pedagogicheskie usloviya razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya u studentov vuzov [Organizational and Pedagogical Conditions for the Development of Critical Thinking of University Students]. Higher School of Economics.
- Osachenko, Y.S., Sukhanova, S. Y., Enns, I. A. Kriticheskoe myshlenie kak osnova nauchno-issledovatel’skoj kul’tury [Critical thinking as a basis of research culture]. EdCrunch-Tomsk, Tomsk State University Press, 192–196.
- Shapinskaya, E. N. (2016). Filosofiya pop-kul’tury ili populyarnaya filosofiya? (Sud’ba filosofii v epohu massovoj kul’tury) [Pop culture philosophy or popular philosophy? (The fate of philosophy in the era of mass culture)]. Culture of Culture, 2016, 1, 3(11). 7.
- Bykova, K. S. (2022). Lingvokognitivnye mekhanizmy formirovaniya nauchnogo mifa v nauchno-populyarnom diskurse: k postanovke problemy [Linguo-cognitive mechanisms for the formation of a scientific myth in popular science discourse: to the statement of the problem]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 4 (222), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2022-4-96-106
- Hintikka, J., Hintikka, M. B. (1982). Sherlock Holmes confronts modern logic: Toward a theory of information-seeking through questioning. Argumentation: Approaches to theory formation, 55–76.
- Genot, E. J. (2021). The Holmesian logician: Sherlock Holmes’“Science of Deduction and Analysis” and the logic of discovery. Synthese, 198(11), 10169–10186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02709-w
- Askin, N., Mauskapf, M. (2017). What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 910–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417728662
- Bello, P., Garcia, D. (2021). Cultural Divergence in popular music: the increasing diversity of music consumption on Spotify across countries. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00855-1
- Fleischer, R. (2021). Universal Spotification? The shifting meanings of “Spotify” as a model for the media industries. Popular Communication, 19(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1744607
- Burkart, P. (Ed.). (2020). Spotification of popular culture in the field of popular communication. Routledge.
- Allen, B. (2023). Indigenous Epistemologies of North America. Episteme, 20(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.37
- Harrison, N., Tennent, C., Burgess, C., Vass, G., Guenther, J., Lowe, K., Moodie, N. (2023). Knowing in Being: An understanding of Indigenous knowledge in its relationship to reality through enacted curriculum. In Assessing the Evidence in Indigenous Education Research: Implications for Policy and Practice (pp. 125-139). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- de Sousa Santos, B. (2023). Law and the Epistemologies of the South. Cambridge University Press.
- Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2023). Beyond the coloniser’s model of the world: towards reworlding from the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2171389
- Gilbert D. T., Krull D. S., Malone P. S. (1990) Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(4), 601.
- Brashier, N. M., Marsh, E. J. (2020). Judging truth. Annual review of psychology, 71, 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807
- Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological review, 69(4), 366.
- Evans, J. S. B. (2022). The psychology of deductive reasoning: Logic. In Thinking in perspective, 90–110. Routledge.
- Maynes, J. (2015). Critical thinking and cognitive bias. Informal Logic, 35(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v35i2.4187
- Dacey, A. (2020). Come now, let us reason together: Cognitive bias, individualism, and interactionism in critical thinking education. Informal Logic, 40(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v40i1.6024
- Korsmeyer, C. (2007). Philosophy and the probable impossible. Philosophy and the interpretation of pop culture, 21–40.
- Keil, F. C. (2012) Does Folk Science Develop? The Journey from Child to Scientist: Integrating Cognitive Development and the Education Sciences. American Psychological Association, 67–86. http://doi.org/10.1037/13617-003
- Maslanov, E.V., Dolmatov, A.V. (2019). Grazhdanskaya nauka – nauka kak prizvanie [Citizen Science – Science as a Vocation], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956345
- Flier. A. IA. (2013). Pop-nauka: mezhdu poznaniem i razvlecheniem [Pop science: between cognition and entertainment], Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 1, 32–44.
- Zheleznyak, V.N. (2017). Nauka bez uchenoj stepeni [Science without the academic credentials], Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law, 1, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.1.05
- Negahneewin Research Centre (2020) An Indigenous Knowledge Mobilization Packsack: Utilizing Indigenous Learning Outcomes to Promote and Assess Critical Thinking and Global Citizenship. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
- Lun, V. M. C., Fischer, R., Ward, C. (2010). Exploring cultural differences in critical thinking: Is it about my thinking style or the language I speak? Learning and Individual differences, 20(6), 604–616. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.07.001
- Inoue, Y. (2005) Critical Thinking and Diversity Experiences: A Connection. American Educational Research Association.
- Siegel, H. (2017) Education’s epistemology: rationality, diversity, and critical thinking. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190682675.001.0001
- Jones, N.N., Walton R. (2018) Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In: Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (A.M. Haas, M.F. Eble eds.), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607327585.c010
- Ab Kadir, M. A. (2016) Critical thinking and learner diversity in the Australian curriculum: Implications and epistemological tensions. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2016.1272530
- Utley, E. A. (2017) What does Beyoncé mean to young girls? Journal of Popular Music Studies, 29(2), e12212. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpms.12212
- Keleta-Mae, N. (2017) A Beyoncé feminist. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice. 38(1), 236–246.
- Arzumanova, I. (2016) The culture industry and Beyoncé’s proprietary blackness. Celebrity Studies. 7(3), 421–424.
For Citation: Golubinskaya, A. (2024) Critical Thinking in Popular Culture Context: the Transformation of the Image and the Differentiation of the Concept. International Journal of Cultural Research, 1 (54). 21–36. DOI: 10.52173/2079-1100_2024_1_21
DOI: 10.52173/2079-1100_2024_1_21